Lesson 6 of 6
In Progress

Bible in the World – Haggai

Christians and Rebuilding the Temple

A close-up of a book

Description automatically generated

(Visigothic-Mozarabic Bible – Codex Legionensis 2) Consecration of the Desert Sanctuary, c960CE

Lutheran biblical scholar Paul Hanson accused Haggai (and Zechariah) of excessive involvement in the political program of temple rebuilding, squandering the moral authority of the prophet.  Similarly, Martin Luther himself cautioned the readers of Haggai that they should not think of the prophet as addressing the physical rebuilding of the temple, but about the abiding nature of the Word of God: 

If we should consider the subject matter unsympathetically, the prophet will seem quite trivial on the surface, especially in our day. Everything about which he prophesies, especially about rebuilding the temple, has ceased. As a consequence, we must consider the subject matter correctly, so that we look not so much at it as at the Word of God. [Luther Works, Lectures on the Minor Prophets XVIII. Hilton Oswald, ed. (St Louis, Concordia, 1975)].

Many Christians consider the need to rebuild a physical temple in Jerusalem to have been ended by Jesus’ words to the Samaritan woman in John 4:21: “A time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain, nor in Jerusalem… but in spirit and truth.” The Epistle to the Hebrews argues that the sacrificial system came to the end of its usefulness with Jesus’ death and resurrection (see, especially Hebrews 8-10). Most Catholic, Orthodox and mainline Protestant Christians do not expect a physical rebuilding of another  temple with attendant sacrificial systems in Jerusalem. 

Yet other Christians read passages from Daniel, Haggai, Ezekiel and elsewhere (in addition to Matthew 24:15 and 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4) as indicating that another (third) temple must be built before the coming of the eschaton. This view is particularly prominent among dispensationalists and evangelical Christians, but is certainly not limited to them. Charles Wesley, the great hymnist of the Methodist tradition, wrote in 1762:

We know, it must be done,

For God hath spoke the word,

All Israel shall their Saviour own,

To their first state restor’d:

Re-build by his command,

Jerusalem shall rise,

Her temple on Moriah stand

Again, and touch the skies. 

The Temple Institute, among other organizations, seeks to apply the encouragements of Haggai to the modern world, in order to remove obstacles – the Dome of the Rock – and rebuild the Jerusalem Temple. This little book, then, remains at the center of geopolitics and religious divides in the 21st century.

A Chosen Ruler

Political leaders across times and places have aspired to claim divine support. This is no less true in the 21st century C.E. than it was in the sixth century B.C.E. Haggai’s prophecy of kingdoms being shaken before the emergence of someone who speaks for God has been an attractive prophecy (Haggai 2:20-23). Rashi (the great 11th century C.E. Jewish sage and commenter), citing the Talmud (Avodah Zarah 9a), argues that Zerubbabel stood before the Lord throughout his lifetime, but Persia fell a scant 34 years after the completion of the Second Temple. 

Despite the explicit linkage with Zerubbabel, many have sought to claim the authority of God’s servant to act in God’s name. Kings and princes have claimed divine right to rule throughout the centuries. Frequently, in electoral politics, God is invoked on one side or another (or by all sides) to bolster the reputation of a political candidate or policy goal. Recent elections in the United States see Christians arguing for why a chosen candidate is a better fit for their understanding of what God is doing in the world. 

This is the downside of the political prophecies of Haggai that biblical scholar Paul Hanson warns about. Instead of simply arguing for righteousness and just behavior, Haggai “names names,” and claims a particular person as the divinely chosen leader of the fractured but emerging community. When leaders are truly chosen by God for a task, this clarity can be a blessing. But more often, claims to know who God has chosen for civil leadership are proffered on multiple sides, and those claims are frequently at odds with each other. 

The difference for Haggai seems to have been in noticing that God had chosen Zerubbabel for a particular task – leading the people in rebuilding a relatively small Temple – that was accomplished in a relatively short amount of time (approximately four years). Zerubbabel was responsive to God stirring up his spirit, and functioned as God’s agent for a specific task, for a specific time.