1 Kings 15:25-16:28 – Early Kings of Israel

SUMMARY

The early kings of Israel: Nadab (901-900), Baasha (900-877), Elah (877), Zimri (876), and Omri (876-869) are evaluated very differently than those of Judah. Following in the pattern of Jeroboam, they flourish politically while growing in apostasy.

ANALYSIS

JudahJudah was the name of Jacob's fourth son and one of the 12 tribes. More, the house of David, is evaluated very differently from Israel, the house of Jeroboam. With that pattern established in the reigns of Abijam and Asa, the narrative moves on to a consideration of the early kings of Israel where Ahijah’s solemn announcement of disaster (1 Kings 14:15) is drawn out in the chaotic reigns of these monarchs:

• Jeroboam’s son Nadab was assassinated after a brief two years on the throne (1 Kings 15:25-31).
• Baasha’s initial act as king, following the assassination of Nadab, was to exterminate the house of Jeroboam in fulfillment of Ahijah’s prophecy (1 Kings 14:10-11). Another prophet, Jehu, determined that Baasha was no better than Jeroboam and that his house would be eliminated as well (1 Kings 15:33-16:7).
• Elah, Baasha’s son, like Nadab the son of Jeroboam, reigns only two years before he is assassinated by Zimri, who lasted only a week before  dying in a self-instigated fire (1 Kings 16:8-20).
• Omri (1 Kings 16:21-28) achieved some stability, though not at first. It took several years before Omri defeated Tibni, his rival for the throne, and established one of the most impressive reigns of all the rulers of Judah and Israel: his dynasty lasted for 40 years; for years after his reign, Assyria referred to the nation of Israel as “The House of Omri”; his defeat of Moab is recorded on the Mesha Stela (the so-called “Moabite Stone”); an able administrator, Omri also moved the capital from Tirzah to Samaria which dramatically increased Israel’s trade relations. Nevertheless, the reign of Omri is described as doing “more evil than all who were before him” (v. 25). The standard of judgment in the Bible is that of cultic fidelity, not political or economic success.